欢迎来到新航道北京学校官网!

首页 剑桥雅思7

剑桥雅思7写作:Test2雅思写作真题+范文

剑桥雅思7写作:Test2雅思写作真题+范文

发布时间:2020-12-04 关键词:剑桥雅思7写作:Test2雅思写作真题+范文
摘要: 剑桥雅思7写作:Test2雅思写作真题+范文

  师资点题剑桥雅思7作文:

Task 1范文

Task 1范文

  Task 1范文

  The graph presents an overall view of how much a European country spent on fish and some different kinds of meat between 1979 and 2004.

  As shown in the graph, compared with fish, beef and lamb, chicken was the most popular, in other words, the consumption on it witnessed a surprising increase of about 100 grams, rocketing from around 140 grams to 245 grams.

  As for beef and lamb, although they both suffered from a downward trend, people in this country consumed much more in the former than in the latter. What was worth mentioning, in addition, is that beef used to be the champion of these foods with about 225 grams in 1979. To give more details, beef experienced more drastic changes than lamb, seeing a substantial rebound of about 70 grams in last 2 years from 1981 to 1983.

  On the whole, fish which was clearly the least popular remained almost stable at roughly 50 grams over the period despite a short and slow drop from 1979 to 1982.

  In conclusion, we can see immediately the sharp contrast between the soaring chicken and falling beef, lamb and fish.

Test2Task2

  剑桥雅思7写作范文Test2Task2:

  The flexibility of enforcing laws has fallen into contentious topics of discussion especially when criminals are thought to do evils for some good motivations. Naturally people’s views differ from that the circumstance under which people have wrong doings should be taken into account to that fixed laws see no tolerance for any kind of crimes.

  It is a bit understandable that the preference that judges are supposed to make room for the circumstance of a crime and its intentions prior to making sentence prevails among a certain number of people due to the fact that people in some extreme circumstances such as drought, flooding or even self-defense commit crimes just to survive. However, human beings’ natures pitifully make it impossible that more freedom is left to judges to decide on the punishment because human beings are born emotional and always selfish. As a result, without the prerequisite of establishment of justice and equity, the day when sentence is made in a flexible way will never arrive.

  I think that it is the arbitrary law system, to be exact, the fixed punishments that do work in many aspects. For one thing, it can serve the deferring purpose and especially fills an indispensable role in avoiding the resistance or even riots in public. To a larger extent, it is able to frighten or scarce off the would-be criminals to ensure a safe living environment for the law-abiding citizens and warn those wrong doers of thinking twice. For another, this practice is surely a great consolation to the victims, for quite a few of them firmly hold that their loss of property or beloved must be compensated by merciless punishments based on fixed laws.

  All in all, to ensure that the society can run smoothly before relatively perfect establishment of equity and justice, an overwhelming majority of cases have to be decided by cool laws.